Sep 25, 2026 · 1h 33m
UVU review exposes unresolved security questions
WE WERE RIGHT! UVU Releases Their Independent Review. | Ep 394
The episode examines whether Utah Valley University’s planning and security decisions adequately addressed known risks surrounding the September 10, 2025 events.
- 1UVU documents detail event-planning decisions, security roles, venue concerns, and unresolved emergency-management issues.
- 2Owens places the review inside a wider chronology involving Charlie Kirk, political developments, and disputed allegations.
- 3A theory about cameras failing before Charlie was struck remains unverified, underscoring the investigation’s unresolved questions.
Don't miss
Owens considers whether an electromagnetic pulse could explain security cameras reportedly going offline before Charlie was struck, while acknowledging the theory remains uncertain.
The brief
Candace Owens opens by describing alleged efforts to discredit her, then frames Utah Valley University’s independent review as evidence in a broader investigation.
The review’s details center on event planning, TPUSA coordination, venue selection, protest concerns, and emergency procedures that were approved despite unresolved security questions.
Owens then builds a chronology involving Charlie Kirk, political developments, Epstein-related commentary, and the dismissal of a criminal case against Kip Crofts.
The episode’s sharpest unresolved claim concerns security cameras reportedly failing for several crucial minutes before Charlie was struck; Owens raises an electromagnetic-pulse theory but acknowledges uncertainty.
Owens closes by promising further document review and a broader map of people connected to the investigation, leaving the central questions open rather than settled.
Featuring
Charlie Kirk
Dave SmithListen to the full episode and explore every guest, topic, and moment on PodLume.