Aug 14, 2026 · 1h 20m

Greenwald links surveillance, war propaganda, and political paralysis

Glenn Greenwald: Propaganda, Putin, AOC, and the New Movement Rising From the Ashes of MAGA

The conversation examines how secrecy, censorship, distraction, and a fortified two-party system may limit resistance to war and surveillance.

3 key takeaways

1Surveillance and censorship can narrow public awareness, making government wrongdoing and wartime suffering harder to see.
2Greenwald argues that propaganda and intelligence-agency alliances have redirected political dissent while normalizing confrontation with Russia.
3The speakers debate whether an anti-war, pro-civil-liberties movement can break through the two-party system’s entrenched defenses.

Don't miss

Greenwald’s argument that hiding atrocities and wrongdoing can prevent the public outrage that historically fueled anti-war movements.

The brief

Glenn Greenwald joins Tucker Carlson to examine surveillance cameras, expanding government and corporate monitoring, and the erosion of privacy that follows when ubiquitous observation becomes ordinary.

They argue that war requires public consent, yet propaganda, distraction, and concealed suffering can prevent citizens from seeing the costs that once drove mass anti-war movements.

The conversation turns to Russia, where Greenwald connects Russiagate and the broader national-security consensus to the demonization of foreign leaders and closer Democratic alignment with intelligence agencies.

TikTok, COVID-era censorship, factory farming, and addictive media become examples in a larger argument: controlling what people can see may be more effective than defeating dissent openly.

The closing question is whether an anti-war, pro-civil-liberties movement can challenge both parties, which Greenwald says share broad commitments even as major change remains inevitable.

Featuring

Glenn Greenwald