Aug 13, 2026 · 1h 1m
Crowder makes debate and SPLC allegations the episode’s central test
Arrests Finally! Ex-SPLC Boss Cuffed For Secretly Funding KKK & Neo Nazis
The episode links media controversy, political hypocrisy, and disputed allegations to a broader argument about evidence, credibility, and public accountability.
- 1Crowder previews a Candace Owens–Andrew Wilson debate centered on competing claims, source transparency, and the credibility of evidence.
- 2The hosts examine Alex Cooper’s Barstool dispute and argue that unproven workplace accusations can become powerful leverage with lasting consequences.
- 3The program presents allegations about SPLC funding and CNN coverage while repeatedly questioning how institutions frame contested facts.
Don't miss
Crowder’s discussion of allegations involving the SPLC’s informants and alleged extremist-group funding becomes the episode’s clearest institutional-accountability test.
The brief
Steven Crowder opens by previewing Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson’s upcoming debate, emphasizing source transparency, public disagreement, and a planned live fact-check.
The program moves through Netflix comedy, WNBA platitudes, Alex Cooper’s dispute with Barstool, and allegations that workplace accusations can become career-destroying leverage.
Inflation and affordability become a test of political consistency as the hosts compare Dan Crenshaw’s comments with the everyday economics of Chipotle burritos.
The episode’s most consequential claims concern the SPLC, including allegations about paid informants and money directed toward extremist groups; the discussion presents those claims as a challenge to institutional credibility.
Crowder closes by criticizing CNN’s framing of a hanging incident, promoting a Piers Morgan appearance, and beginning an answer on whether Social Security reform could raise workers’ take-home pay.
Candace Owens
Piers Morgan
Dave Portnoy
Crazy Rich AsiansListen to the full episode and explore every guest, topic, and moment on PodLume.